Week 5 Tutorial

I had a little bit to catch up in during this class so I spent my time, while everyone else was playing around with Sewing on tape, looking at the Gutenberg bible and comparing and noting the contrasts between the two separate copies. I noted that in the paper copy it seemed to be targeted more towards a noble and wealthy group of people due to the greater and more colorful use of imagery throughout the book. The velum copy seems to be suited more to public use, or for more dedicated religious followers because of its lack on intricate designs and color.

I also noted that the two books were almost identical, however there were different color ranges and some of the imagery was more elaborate in the paper version. I noted as well that the paper version had much clearer lettering. However this can be attributed to the fact that paper absorbed ink much more efficiently than the velum could.

It was brought to my attention that the use of imagery in relation to the text was in order to help lead the reader’s eye onto another chapter or paragraph. Sometimes the text was set out in a way that the next paragraphed needed to be marked so there was no confusion. I also believe that the images help create the mood for what the manuscript entails.

While in class I had a look at the Kelmscott Chaucer as well and noted some differences in this illuminated manuscript in comparison to those from the illuminated manuscript era. The Kelmscott Chaucer can be considered as William Morris’ tribute to the 15^th century illuminated manuscript. However when compared to the Book of Kells, as seen below, the Kelmscott Chaucer is vastly differently.

For instance, the lack of color is a major difference, as well as how elaborate the designs are in the Kelmscott Chaucer, it almost seems overdone, or overbeautified if you prefer. Also, the imagery itself in the Kelmscott Chaucer is rather extravagant and in great detail, where in the Book of Kells the imagery is far more beast-like and primitive.

I did find it interesting looking at the Kelmscott Press, and the Chaucer. It’s inspiring to know that someone could have such a love for the illuminated manuscript as to want to recreate one of their own.